Sustainable production strategies in agricultural transport: Balancing economic efficiency and environmental impact

Przemysław Niewiadomski (1) , Agnieszka Merkisz-Guranowska (2)
(1) Department of Strategic Management and Marketing, Faculty of Economics and Management, Institute of Management and Quality Sciences, University of Zielona Góra , Poland
(2) Poznan University of Technology, plac Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie 5, 60-965 Poznań , Poland

Abstract

Purpose. This paper aims to present a sustainable production strategy for manufacturing parts and components for agricultural transport means, focusing on minimising production costs and post-production waste generation. Methodology. The research employs a case study approach, using participant observation and analysis of a manufacturing company's specific production process for an agricultural trailer floor panel. The authors propose a model for optimising raw material selection and utilising post-production waste to achieve economic and environmental savings. Results. The results demonstrate that by selecting the appropriate raw material dimensions and implementing a product diversification strategy to utilise post-production waste, the manufacturer can reduce material costs and environmental losses while generating additional revenue streams. Theoretical contribution. The study contributes to sustainable production management by proposing a practical strategy model that balances economic efficiency and environmental concerns in manufacturing agricultural transport components. The model emphasises the importance of raw material selection, waste minimisation, and product diversification to achieve sustainability goals. Practical implications. The findings provide valuable insights for manufacturers in the agricultural transport sector, highlighting the potential benefits of adopting sustainable production strategies. The proposed model can be implemented in practice to optimise resource utilisation, reduce waste generation, and improve overall economic and environmental performance.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Akeem, L. B. (2017). Effect of cost control and cost reduction techniques in organisational performance. International business and management, 14(3), 19-26.
Ambroziak, T., Jacyna, M., Jacyna-Gołda, I., Jachimowski, R., Merkisz-Guranowska, A., Pyza, D., & Żak, J. (2014). O pewnym podejściu do modelowania systemu transportowego w aspekcie zrównoważonego rozwoju. Logistyka, (4), 1617-1624.
Idobayeva, A. (2020). Improvement of the Enterprise Management System Based on Modern Principles of Building Business Processes, Controlling and Risk Management. Three Seas Economic Journal, 1(3), 40-45. https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2020-3-7
Jacyna, M. (2009). Modelowanie i ocena systemów transportowych. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej.
Korneev, A. M., Al-Saeedi, F. A., Al-Sabry, G. M., & Nagi, A. M. (2014). Building a managing system of complex production processe. Theoretical & Applied Science, 9(17), 50-53. https://doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2014.09.17.8
Kotlar, J., De Massis, A., Wright, M., & Frattini, F. (2018). Organisational goals: Antecedents, formation processes and implications for firm behavior and performance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20, S3-S18. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12170
Kraus, S., Kauranen, I., & Reschke, C. H. (2011). Identification of domains for a new conceptual model of strategic entrepreneurship using the configuration approach. Management research review, 34(1), 58-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171111096478
Lisiecka, K. (2011). Znormalizowane systemy zarządzania, ich certyfikacja a rozwój przedsiębiorstwa. Zeszyty Naukowe/Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu, (166), 38-57.
Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1653531. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531
Oladimeji, M. S., & Udosen, I. (2019). The effect of diversification strategy on organisational performance. Journal of Competitiveness, 11(4), 120-131. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2019.04.08
Pacheco, D., Pergher, I., Jung, C. F., & ten Caten, C. S. (2014). Strategies for increasing productivity in production systems. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 5(2), 344-359. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v5i2.134
Suchánek, P., Richter, J., & Králová, M. (2014). Customer satisfaction, product quality and performance of companies. Review of economic perspectives, 14(4), 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0003
Trzcieliński, S., Włodarkiewicz-Klimek, H., & Pawłowski, K. (2013). Współczesne koncepcje zarządzania. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej.
Yang, M., Chen, L., Wang, J., Msigwa, G., Osman, A. I., Fawzy, S., ... & Yap, P. S. (2023). Circular economy strategies for combating climate change and other environmental issues. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 21(1), 55-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01499-6
Yurtsever, A. E. (2023). The role and importance of shortening product life cycle with a planned obsolescence strategy in green marketing. Journal of Management and Economic Studies, 5(1), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.26677/TR1010.2023.1261

Authors

Przemysław Niewiadomski
Agnieszka Merkisz-Guranowska
agnieszka.merkisz-guranowska@put.poznan.pl (Primary Contact)
Niewiadomski, P., & Merkisz-Guranowska, A. (2024). Sustainable production strategies in agricultural transport: Balancing economic efficiency and environmental impact. Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics, 9(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.14254/jsdtl.2024.9-1.3

Article Details

No Related Submission Found