Analyses of carbon footprint in the import process for wine
Article Sidebar
-
carbon footprint, wine distribution, logistics, greenhouse gas emissions, supply chain, sustainable transport
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigates whether wines imported from the New World generate higher carbon emissions per 0.75L bottle during distribution to Germany than Old World wines and identifies key factors influencing the carbon footprint (CF) in the distribution process.
Methodology: The research analyses a large dataset (over 220,000 records) from a primary European logistics provider, applying the EN 16258 standard and EcoTransIT World (ETW) tool to calculate CO2 equivalents for various distribution channels, shipment sizes, and modes of transport. Simulations for New World shipments complement empirical data.
Results: Distribution channel, shipment size, and logistics handling significantly influence CF per bottle. Large, direct shipments to retailers have lower CF than small, multi-stop shipments. Contrary to common assumptions, New World wines do not always have a higher CF than Old World wines; logistics networks and shipment handling are critical determinants.
Theoretical Contribution: This paper extends the literature by empirically quantifying the impact of logistics variables on wine CF, challenging the generalisation that New World imports are inherently less sustainable.
Practical Implications: Findings inform wine importers, retailers, and policymakers on optimising logistics for lower emissions and provide a nuanced basis for consumer sustainability choices.
SDG 7: Affordable and Clean Energy; SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure; SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities; SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production; SDG 13: Climate Action
Full text article
References
Ailawadi, K., & Farris, P. (2020). Getting Multi-Channel Distribution Right. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119632894
Amienyo, D., Camilleri, C., & Azapagic, A. (2014). Environmental impacts of consumption of Australian red wine. Journal of Cleaner Production, (72), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.044
Blass, V., & Corbett, C. J. (2018). Same supply chain, different models: integrating perspectives from life cycle assessment and supply chain management. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 22(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12550
Bosco, S., Di Bene, C., Galli, M., Remorini, D., Massai, R., & Bonari, E. (2011). Greenhouse gas emissions in the agricultural phase of wine production in the Maremma rural district in Tuscany, Italy. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 6(2), e15. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2011.e15
D'Ammaro, D., Capri, E., Valentino, F., Grillo, S., Fiorini, E., & Lamastra, L. (2021). A multi-criteria approach to evaluate the sustainability performances of wines: The Italian red wine case study. Science of The Total Environment, 799, 149446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149446
Deutsches Weininstitut. (2023). Deutscher Wein Statistik 23/24. Bodenheim: Deutches Weininstitut.
DSLV. (n.d.). Berechnung von Treibhausgasemissionen in Spedition und Logistik gemäß DIN EN 16258, 2. aktualisierte Auflagen.
EcoTransIT World. (2024). Einvornmental Methodology and Data Update 2024. https://www.ecotransit.org/wp-content/uploads/20240308_Methodology_Report_Update_2024.pdf.
Gazulla, C., Raugei, M., & Fullana-i-Palmer, P. (2010). Taking a life cycle look at crianza wine production in Spain: Where are the bottlenecks?. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, 330-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0173-6
Göbl, M. (2009). Logistikdienstleister bewerten. Verkehrsrundschau Spezial. Who is Who Logistik 2010, 24-27.
Göbl, M., & Niersbach, B. (2017). Comparing the service levels in the European spirits market: A model for evaluating the complexity of a country in the transportation of spirits and an empirical investigation of six different European countries. Journal of Applied Leadership and Management, 5. 111-132.
Kranke, A., Schmied, M., & Schön, A. (2011). CO2 Berechnung in der Logistik. Vogel Verlag.
Marco-Fondevila, M., Moneva, J. M., & Llena-Macarulla, F. (2020). Accounting for carbon footprint flows in wine production process. Case study in Spanish winery. Applied Sciences, 10(23), 8381. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238381
Merli, R., Preziosi, M., & Acampora, A. (2018). Sustainability experiences in the wine sector: toward the development of an international indicators system. Journal of cleaner production, 172, 3791-3805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.129
Navarro, A., Puig, R., & Fullana-i-Palmer, P. (2017). Product vs corporate carbon footprint: Some methodological issues. A case study and review on the wine sector. Science of the total environment, 581, 722-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.190
Navarro, A., Puig, R., Kılıç, E., Penavayre, S., & Fullana-i-Palmer, P. (2017). Eco-innovation and benchmarking of carbon footprint data for vineyards and wineries in Spain and France. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 1661-1671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.124
Neto, B., Dias, A. C., & Machado, M. (2013). Life cycle assessment of the supply chain of a Portuguese wine: from viticulture to distribution. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18, 590-602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0518-4
Point, E., Tyedmers, P., & Naugler, C. (2012). Life cycle environmental impacts of wine production and consumption in Nova Scotia, Canada. Journal of Cleaner Production, 27, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.035
Ponstein. (n.d.). Ablauf und Umfang des CO2-Fußabdrucks für Weingüter. Internes Dokument.
Ponstein, H. J., Ghinoi, S., & Steiner, B. (2019). How to increase sustainability in the Finnish wine supply chain? Insights from a country of origin based greenhouse gas emissions analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 768-780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.088
Ponstein, H. J., Meyer-Aurich, A., & Prochnow, A. (2019). Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation options for German wine production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 800-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.206
Railway Tools, D. B. (2024). https://railway.tools/#/de/connections. Retrieved from https://railway.tools/#/de/connections
Rugani, B., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Benedetto, G., & Benetto, E. (2013). A comprehensive review of carbon footprint analysis as an extended environmental indicator in the wine sector. Journal of cleaner production, 54, 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.036
Russo, V., Strever, A. E., & Ponstein, H. J. (2021). Exploring sustainability potentials in vineyards through LCA? Evidence from farming practices in South Africa. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 26(7), 1374-1390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01911-3
Schramm, H. J., & Lehner, M. (2024). Innovators and transformers: a benchmarking study of online carbon emission calculators for freight transport. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 54(11), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-12-2023-0460
Scrucca, F., Baldassarri, C., Baldinelli, G., Bonamente, E., Rinaldi, S., Rotili, A., & Barbanera, M. (2020). Uncertainty in LCA: An estimation of practitioner-related effects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 122304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122304
Steenwerth, K. L., Strong, E. B., Greenhut, R. F., Williams, L., & Kendall, A. (2015). Life cycle greenhouse gas, energy, and water assessment of wine grape production in California. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20, 1243-1253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0935-2
Szolnoki, G. (2013). A cross-national comparison of sustainability in the wine industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 53, 243-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.045
Vázquez-Rowe, I., Rugani, B., & Benetto, E. (2013). Tapping carbon footprint variations in the European wine sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 43, 146-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.036
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Martin Goebl
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Article Details
