Mobility as a Service for tourism: Challenges and opportunities for meeting the needs of tourists in urban environments
Article Sidebar
-
Mobility as a Service, MaaS, tourism, urban environments, sustainable mobility, transportation services, smart mobility
Abstract
Purpose: This study explores the challenges and opportunities of Mobility as a Service (MaaS) in meeting the needs of tourists in urban environments, aiming to provide insights into its potential for enhancing urban tourism mobility. Methodology: The research employs a mixed-methods approach, combining a systematic literature review, comparative case study analysis of four European MaaS schemes, and a conjoint choice experiment with 500 international tourists. Results: The study reveals that MaaS offers diverse mobility services catering to various tourist needs, with integrated transport modes and competitive pricing being the most valued attributes. Tourists demonstrate willingness to pay for enhanced MaaS features, with preferences varying across demographic segments. Key challenges identified include regulatory barriers, data sharing issues, and the need for stakeholder collaboration. Theoretical contribution: This research extends the understanding of MaaS in tourism contexts, addressing a significant gap in the literature. It provides a conceptual framework for analyzing MaaS in urban tourism and offers empirical evidence on tourist preferences and willingness to pay for MaaS attributes. Practical implications: The findings offer valuable insights for MaaS providers, urban planners, and policymakers in developing and implementing MaaS solutions tailored to tourist needs. The study highlights the importance of flexible package designs, stakeholder collaboration, and addressing regulatory challenges for successful MaaS implementation in urban tourism contexts.
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities; SDG 7: Affordable and Clean Energy; SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure; SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production; SDG 13: Climate Action
Full text article
References
Alyavina, E., Nikitas, A., & Njoya, E. T. (2020). Mobility as a service and sustainable travel behaviour: A thematic analysis study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 73, 362-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.07.004
Audouin, M., & Finger, M. (2018). The development of Mobility-as-a-Service in the Helsinki metropolitan area: A multi-level governance analysis. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 27, 24-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.09.001
Caiati, V., Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. (2020). Bundling, pricing schemes and extra features preferences for mobility as a service: Sequential portfolio choice experiment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 131, 123-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.029
ChoiceMetrics. (2018). Ngene 1.2 user manual & reference guide. ChoiceMetrics.
Ecodesigncircle. (n.d.). Whim – All your journeys. https://www.ecodesigncircle.eu/resources-for-you/117-whim
Gretzel, U., Sigala, M., Xiang, Z., & Koo, C. (2016). Smart tourism: foundations and developments. Electronic Markets, 25(3), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0196-8
Hensher, D. A. (2017). Future bus transport contracts under a mobility as a service (MaaS) regime in the digital age: Are they likely to change?. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 98, 86-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.02.006
Jittrapirom, P., Caiati, V., Feneri, A. M., Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S., González, M. J. A., & Narayan, J. (2017). Mobility as a service: A critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges. Urban Planning, 2(2), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i2.931
Jittrapirom, P., Marchau, V., van der Heijden, R., & Meurs, H. (2020). Future implementation of mobility as a service (MaaS): Results of an international Delphi study. Travel Behaviour and Society, 21, 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2018.12.004
Kamargianni, M., & Matyas, M. (2017). The business ecosystem of mobility-as-a-service. 96th Transportation Research Board (TRB) Annual Meeting, Washington DC, 8-12 January 2017.
Kamargianni, M., Matyas, M., Li, W., & Muscat, J. (2018). Londoners’ attitudes towards car-ownership and Mobility-as-a-Service: Impact assessment and opportunities that lie ahead. MaaSLab - UCL Energy Institute Report, Prepared for Transport for London.
Karlsson, I. C. M., Mukhtar-Landgren, D., Smith, G., Koglin, T., Kronsell, A., Lund, E., Sarasini, S., & Sochor, J. (2020). Development and implementation of Mobility-as-a-Service – A qualitative study of barriers and enabling factors. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 131, 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.028
Le-Klähn, D. T., & Hall, C. M. (2015). Tourist use of public transport at destinations–a review. Current Issues in Tourism, 18(8), 785-803. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.948812
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753831
Lyons, G., Hammond, P., & Mackay, K. (2019). The importance of user perspective in the evolution of MaaS. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 121, 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.010
Matyas, M., & Kamargianni, M. (2019). The potential of mobility as a service bundles as a mobility management tool. Transportation, 46(5), 1951-1968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9913-4
Mulley, C. (2017). Mobility as a services (MaaS) – does it have critical mass?. Transport Reviews, 37(3), 247-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1280932
Sigala, M. (2018). New technologies in tourism: From multi-disciplinary to anti-disciplinary advances and trajectories. Tourism Management Perspectives, 25, 151-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2017.12.003
Smile Einfach Mobil. (2021). Smile - the mobility app for Vienna. https://smile-einfachmobil.at/index_en.html
Smith, G., Sochor, J., & Karlsson, I. M. (2018). Mobility as a Service: Development scenarios and implications for public transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 69, 592-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.04.001
Sochor, J., Strömberg, H., & Karlsson, I. C. M. (2018). Implementing Mobility as a Service: Challenges in integrating user, commercial, and societal perspectives. Transportation Research Record, 2536(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3141/2536-01
Sochor, J., Strömberg, H., & Karlsson, I. M. (2018). Travelers' motives for adopting a new, innovative travel service: Insights from the UbiGo field operational test in Gothenburg, Sweden. In 21st World Congress on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Detroit, September 7-11, 2014. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Train, K. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805271
UNWTO. (2023). UNWTO Tourism Data Dashboard. Retrieved from https://www.unwto.org/tourism-data/unwto-tourism-dashboard
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Iryna Vovk, Yaroslav Vovk, Yuriy Vovk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Article Details
