Addressing the asymmetry between central and local air protection policies: Insights from Poland
Article Sidebar
-
smog, air protection policy, politics, local government, municipal government, Kraków, municipality, air protection programme
Abstract
Purpose: This paper examines the asymmetry between the air protection policies of the central government and local authorities in Poland, using the city of Kraków as a case study.
Methodology: The study employs a comparative method to contrast the Polish state's coal policy with the air protection efforts of the Kraków local government. A systems analysis approach is used to identify the causes and effects of the divergent policies.
Results: The analysis reveals a lack of alignment between the central government's focus on maintaining coal extraction and the local government's efforts to reduce air pollution. Kraków authorities have taken significant measures to improve air quality, but face challenges due to insufficient support from the central government and neighboring municipalities.
Theoretical contribution: The paper highlights the importance of policy symmetry and coordination between different levels of government in addressing complex environmental issues like air pollution. It contributes to understanding multi-level governance dynamics in the context of air protection.
Practical implications: The findings underscore the need for a collaborative model of air protection policy that engages central authorities, local governments, private sector entities, and civil society. Establishing air protection councils at the voivodship, county and municipal levels is proposed as a mechanism to facilitate this coordination. Integrating air quality considerations into local governments' management control systems is also recommended.
Full text article
References
Annex No. 1 to Resolution No. XXXII/451/17, Program ochrony powietrza dla woj. małopolskiego, Załącznik nr 1 do uchwały Nr XXXII/451/17 Sejmiku Województwa Małopolskiego z dnia 23 stycznia 2017 roku.
Borghesi, S., & Montini, M. (2016). The best (and worst) of GHG emission trading systems: Comparing the EU ETS with its followers. Frontiers in Energy Research, 4, 27. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2016.00027
Campos-Alba, C. M., De la Higuera-Molina, E. J., Pérez-López, G., & Zafra-Gómez, J. L. (2019). Measuring the efficiency of public and private delivery forms: An Application to the waste collection service using order-M data panel frontier analysis. Sustainability, 11(7), 2056. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072056
Dziadul, J. (2018). Państwo sypnęło górnikom. A przecież węgiel się nie opłaca [The state showered the miners. And yet coal does not pay off]. Polityka, https://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/rynek/1746794,1,panstwo-sypnelo-gornikom-a-przeciez-wegiel-sie-nie-oplaca.read, Accessed 25.04.2018 r.
Filipcevic Cordes, V. (2017). City sovereignty: Urban resistance and rebel cities reconsidered. Urban Science, 1(3), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci1030022
Judgment in case C-336/16 Commission v Poland, The Court of Justice of the European Union Press release No. 19/18 Luxembourg, 22 Feb 2018.
LKA.410.038.2015 Reg. no. 209/2016/P/15/074/LKA, Funkcjonowanie górnictwa węgla kamiennego w latach 2007-2015 na tle założeń programu rządowego [The functioning of the hard coal mining industry in 2007-2015 in the context of the government programme guidelines], Delegatura w Katowicach [Branch Office in Katowice], Warszawa 2017.
LKA.410.038.2015 Reg. no. 209/2016/P/15/074/LKA, p. 28. Accessed 13.01.2020, Supreme Audit Office, Informacja o wynikach kontroli funkcjonowania górnictwa węgla kamiennego w latach 2007-2015 na tle założeń programu rządowego [Information on the results of the control of the hard coal mining operation in 2007-2015 in the context of the government programme guidelines].
Małopolska. (n.d.). Projekt LIFE-IP MAŁOPOLSKA. Retrieved from https://powietrze.malopolska.pl/life/.
Ministry of Economy. (2006). Strategia działalności górnictwa węgla kamiennego w Polsce w latach 2007 – 2015 [The strategy of hard coal mining activity in Poland in the years 2007 – 2015], Warsaw, 4 September 2006.
Project of State Ecological Policy 2030. (n.d.). State ecological policy 2030 https://bip.mos.gov.pl/fileadmin/user_upload/bip/prawo/projekty/PROJEKT_POLITYKI_EKOLOGICZNEJ_PANSTWA_2030/Projekt_Polityki_ekologicznej_panstwa_2030.pdf.
Regulation of the Minister of Environment of 8 Oct 2019 on the levels of certain substances in the air, Journal of Laws 2019, item 193.
Ślusarczyk, K. (n.d.). Skażenie miast zanieczyszczonym powietrzem [Contamination of cities with polluted air]. The WHO Report, https://dziecisawazne.pl/skazenie-miast-zanieczyszczonym-powietrzem-raport-who/
The Act of 27 Apr 2001, Environmental Protection Law, Journal of Laws 2001, No. 62, item 627 as amended
Wiesner, S., Bechtel, B., Fischereit, J., Gruetzun, V., Hoffmann, P., Leitl, B., ... & Thomsen, S. (2018). Is it possible to distinguish global and regional climate change from urban land cover induced signals? A mid-latitude city example. Urban Science, 2(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci2010012
Wolsink, M. (2020). Distributed energy systems as common goods: Socio-political acceptance of renewables in intelligent microgrids. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 127, 109841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109841
Authors
Copyright (c) 2023 Marta Balcerek-Kosiarz, Adam Jarubas, Bartosz Kozicki, Szymon Mitkow
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Article Details
